Now that I use Twitter on a MUCH more regular basis to vent out my ideas, I think it would be time I compiled all of them into one post! The great thing is, my feed is available on the right hand side so its not as if we aren't connected at all.......
First off....lets talk about the Rome hit.
My thoughts? Brutal call by the NHL. And here is why:
Rome's hit was late, yeah, it was. Did he intend to injure him? No. But did he intend to hit him into next week? Absolutely. What NHL player doesn't do that when they see a guy with his head down in open ice. And the play happened so quickly that sometimes you get greedy and want to finish the check anyway. The things that really hurt Horton were:
Looking off to follow the pass and not watch what was in front of him. Yes, I can respect the fact that he was looking to watch where the play was going to develop. But, dude, you are at the blue line in the middle of the ice. Did you not think anyone was going to be there? And Rome didn't hit him in the head, it was in the middle of the chest. The part that really hurt him was when his head hit the ice. Nothing else.
So the suspension? 4 games is pathetic. You are telling me that Chara's hit on Pacioretty, that Eager's hit on Sedin, that McGinn's hit on Rome, that Seabrook's hit on Bieksa and Torres hit on Seabrook were NOWHERE NEAR as bad as that hit? NOT a chance. Now, NHL, you set a precedent for every other hit. And if you didn't, then that was bush league bogus disciplinary double standard.
Now, onto the hockey.
So, the Canucks have been outscored 12-1 in the past 2 days. A friend of mine put on Facebook today a pretty funny status that I will respect:
What time is it in Vancouver? 12 past Luongo.
I will admit, very creative.
So anyway, here are my thoughts:
1) Manny Malholtra's return did more bad than good.
- Yes, he wins key face-offs. And yes, what an emotional story it was and how could you NOT put him in the lineup. But, the Burrows-Sedins, Raymond/Kesler/Higgins and Torres/Lapierre/Hansen lines have been together for what, almost 2 complete series? And then you mix them up? Well, not totally mix up. But when you throw an extra body in there to give him more ice time, that screws things up. I guarantee you that a few players on the team are pointing fingers (quietly) at Manny Malholtra coming back. And if not, then he should only come on for key face offs and see limited 4th line play.
2) Rome's suspension didn't affect the Canucks?
- Horton is a top forward, and Rome is a 5th D "plug" is the common argument I hear. Well, with Hamhuis gone, Bieksa is the only gritty and tough D man who can handle regular shifts. Rome was seeing upwards of 20 minutes a game and could handle it. Alberts can't. And oh my goodness, did Ballard every show he couldn't last night. What a joke of a signing that was. He should be wearing a Leafs jersey for how bad of a contract that is. Rome is another option for AV to lean on as a shut down guy. So yes, Rome's suspension hurt Vancouver just as much as Horton hurt Boston.
3) Tim Thomas is good, but not GREAT.
- Ok, hammer on me all you want. Insult me. Go for it. But the bottom line is, look at his play, at large, over the playoffs. Of all the goaltenders in the conference finals (Rolo, Niemi, Lou and Thomas) Timmy T has let in the MOST greasy goals in total. No tender has lost more games for his team in the playoffs up til now, than Tim Thomas. Granted, he did steal a few. But for the love of God, he isn't incredible 100 percent of the time. The last 2 games he has done nothing but look behind him every time a puck comes near him, kicks out greasy rebounds all day and is lucky to make some saves. Yes, that requires luck, which is part of being a goalie. But, his forwards and D have adapted to his style and they are there to clear all of the pucks away and make him look brilliant. Don't believe me? Watch the last 3 games again. Game 1 he was excellent. But the last 3, really should have been Canuck blow outs. But their D and forwards are making him look awesome.
4) Conn Smythe
- For the Canucks its Kevin Bieksa, and for Boston it is Brad Marchand. Not Thomas. Not Kesler. Not a sister and not Luongo. Kevin Bieksa has been the Canucks most consistent player from game 1 to the last game so far. And in my opinion, that is what an MVP should be based off of. Not a great performance in the finals. Which, yes, is key to winning a trophy. But a playoff MVP was great all series. And Kevin Bieksa has been that. And for Boston, no player has elevated his game consistently night in and night out like Marchand. He has gotten better and better and better each game. He aggravates players, he is becoming more responsible defensively and his nose has its own Twitter account.
5) Sedins need size with them
- The Bruins are too strong for the Sedin sisters, and the Canucks need to put someone who is big and tough that can open up some ice down low again. The Bruins have figured out the cycle game, and the Canucks only like to score cutesy poo goals as I have said ALLLLL post season long. Should have gone out and picked up a big strong forward at the deadline. So what should AV do? Put Oreskovich with the Sedins, bump Burrows down with Kesler and Raymond, and then put Higgins back with Hansen and Lapierre. Torres can play 4th line since he takes a million penalties anyway and can be an energy player. I would say put Torres with the Sedins, but he will be in the box all day. I said at the start of the year, and Don Cherry said it in the Chicago series, that the Canucks will NOT win a cup with the Sedins if they keep playing cutesy poo crap. Hopefully Oreskovich can help that.
That's it that's all. Feel free to criticize. I'm in the industry of public criticism. But look at it from a different view. You will see it the same way I do.